Controversies focus on the controversial novel “Lolita” Nature is the
art of social responsibility issues. A book review of “New York Times”
said: “Lolita” has undoubtedly been one of the books world news … the
key to the controversial “lolita gothic dress”
and the most difficult, Nabokov very interested in ethical issues. Many
people reading motivation may indeed out to look at the “Lolita” in the
end how “immoral”, the curious reader always think of it as pornography
caused worldwide controversy “Lady Chatterley lover “and” Ulysses “. A
theory consciously to find the true meaning of this vague and buried,
“Lolita” is a symbol of the aging European seduction of young America “,
but another theory was found:” Lolita “Yes” to the young American
seduction aging Europe “fable.
In September 1955, after setbacks,
“Lolita” and finally in Paris, recognized by the Olympia Press, and for
publication. Tolerance published in France, has repeatedly been
criticized for a non-moral or even anti-beauty novel, the glance is also
due to the novel will certainly generated by this understanding.
“Lolita”
Humbert is one of the extreme individualism of the artist installed.
His intrinsic sensitive, imaginative, but nearly paranoid. In the novel,
he has quoted the words of a poet, “the sense of morality in human
nature is an obligation, and we must give the soul a sense of beauty.”
Of course, black lolita dress on sale “Lolita”, this so-called “beauty” both gorgeous art of poetry, but also full of the lust of the Fallen yin evil of guilt.
Banned
in 1954, after the finalization of “Lolita” for a few elder men, who
are lack of reading ability, is an abhorrent novel, so has been to four
nervous published in the U.S.the club refused. The book was well known
in the United States, think of it as a “porn book” to read. From the
years 1955-1982, this book has banned in the United Kingdom, Argentina,
South Africa and other countries.
References: The disputation of Lolita complex
www.lolitaclothingstore.com/blog
没有评论:
发表评论